Close Menu
Asberth News Network
    Facebook Instagram
    • Home
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Download App
    Facebook Instagram
    Asberth News Network
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Breaking News
    • Local News
    • Regional/International News
    • Sports
    • Opinion
    • Back to School
    Asberth News Network
    Home»Main Story»Plain Talk by Jomo Sanga Thomas – A reparationist response to Prince Charles visit?
    Main Story

    Plain Talk by Jomo Sanga Thomas – A reparationist response to Prince Charles visit?

    March 23, 2019Updated:March 23, 20192 Comments6 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Telegram WhatsApp
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Our country Yuremei (renamed St Vincent and the Grenadines by the British Colonialist) has a great history. If we learn it and sell it to the world, it may just become another attractive selling point for our nation. Our people are a fighting people, a determined people, and a people who have willingly shed blood, sweat and tears in our quest for self determination, independence and liberty.


    From the moment he arrived last Wednesday Prince Charles should have been confronted with this history. Instead he was feted on the asinine premise that his mother is our queen and he is our prince. This is legalistic, ceremonial nonsense. Chatoyer is our king and we, his off spring, are the princes and princesses of this nation. Charles is a usurper and we are his enablers.


    Charles should not have been greeted here. Not now. Not ever. We should have made an excuse, any diplomatic nicety as a rationale for why it would have been inopportune or inconvenient to accommodate him at this time. Renewal at 40 anyone! It is an affront to our dignity as a people to entertain the personal embodiment of the British Empire during National Heroes Month and one week after National Heroes Day celebration for national hero, Joseph Chatoyer.


    Charles should have been reminded that British Royal family was ceded control and dominion over our nation in 1763 at the Treaty of Paris. But our proud fore-parents would have none of it. How do we allow Charles to visit St Vincent without reminding him that from 1763 to 1797 our people fought two valiant wars against forces sent to conquer us by his royal linage?
    Why was he not told that after British forces assassinated paramount chief, Joseph Chatoyer in 1795 our people fought for an additional 2 years before conquest? Charles should have been made uncomfortable with the gruesome facts that his people rounded up over 5,000 of our Garifuna brothers and sisters and banished them from their homeland, placed them on Ballicioux, a place the colonial governor said was only fit for lizards. Over 2000 of them perished there and the Governor had the gumption to declare that they died because the food served was too good for them.
    Charles should have been told that his nation committed war crimes, genocide against our people. Someone should have looked into his eyes and told him there is no statute of limitation on genocide and war crimes.


    Charles should have been given a lesson in Garifuna, Kalinago heroism, determination and resistance. Our people’s history should have been traced. He should have been confronted with the facts that the remaining Garifuna were shipped to Roatan, an island in the bay of Honduras, where some initially migrated to Honduras, Belize and Nicaragua and later to the United States.


    Charles forebears tried to annihilate our people, but banishment was a blessing in disguise. Exile allowed those in the Diaspora to retain the language, religion, history and culture while colonialism and domination from conquest to independence destroyed our Garifuna history, language and culture at home.


    A lesson in the history of Yuremei and its people would have allowed Charles to understand that our commitment to freedom explains why of all the countries conquered by the enslaving powers, Yuremei experience of chattel slavery was the shortest, a mere 41 years. Barbados for example was conquered and dominated from 1640.


    Charles should know that it was his royal family in 1670 that formed a company that went into Africa, stole and enslaved our ancestors, dehumanized them and brought them to the New World, where they worked for 100’s of years. Charles should have left here with the inconvenient truth pounding in his head that the comfort, wealth and riches which he and his ilk enjoy came from our people’s labour.
    Was Charles reminded that when our country became independent 40 years ago, his mother left us with an illiteracy rate of over 50 percent, a ramshackle health system with an old colonial military barracks as a hospital? Who looked Charles in the eye and scolded him for the fact that while the Caribbean was once seen as the most prized piece of real estate in the world, for the riches it brought to England and the enslaving world, his family saw it fit to build only two secondary schools after 181 years of colonial domination?


    Charles should not have left here without knowing that Yuremei is the modern day capitol of the reparations movement. Did anyone remind him that the first regional reparations conference was held here in 2013? Does he know that our nation pounded the reparations drum for years at the United Nation? Is Charles aware that it was our leadership that led Caricom to call on the former enslaving powers, especially Britain, to pay reparations for genocide, slavery and underdevelopment brought on by colonialism?


    Who told Charles that all Caribbean people were insulted when in 2017 former British PM Dave Cameron, whose family, as was his, held thousands of enslaved Africans across the region, declared in Jamaica that we the descendants of those humans who were viewed and treated as property should get over our past (African holocaust)and move on? Someone in authority should have reminded Charles that his family, his government agreed to pay 47 million pounds to the slaves owners and none to our ancestors when slavery was abolished in 1838. Charles should have also been told of the dastardly nature of his government in that the British government paid 20 million of the 47 million pounds and made our ancestors work between 1834 and 1838, the so-called indentured period to pay off the remaining 27 million pound. Does Charles know that we were not freed, but that we bought our freedom with our own sweat and blood?
    In trying times like these we should remember Caspar London.

    When Charles’ sister Margaret visited in 1967, Caspar, Patches Knights and others protested the visit with slogans like ‘Go Colonization Go.’ For this act of bravery Caspar was mercilessly beaten by the colonial police.

    A sister who protested the assault on Caspar was kicked and arrested along with him. Does Charles know of this history of resistance to him and his kind?
    No one here should be smiling for Charles. Our Children should not line the streets to meet and greet him. His family, his country, England has a case to answer for the genocide and enslavement of our people. We say reparations now.
    We must never forget Caspar’s teachings: Dare to struggle, Dare to win.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email

    Related Posts

    SENTINEL RESEARCH GROUP POLL REPORT Public Opinion on Citizenship by Investment (CBI) Programs in SVG

    May 7, 2025

    St. Vincent & the Grenadines Hosts Regional Workshop on Heritage Resilience

    May 7, 2025

    Landscaper Charged with Assault and Theft

    May 7, 2025

    NATIONAL AUDITION SUCCESSFULLY HELD FOR CARIFESTA XV DELEGATION

    May 7, 2025
    View 2 Comments

    2 Comments

    1. C ben-David on March 23, 2019 5:22 PM

      To be sure, the indigenous people of SVG were horribly treated by the British conquerors as were the indigenous people and Black slaves throughout the New World.

      But Jomo Thomas ignores the elementary fact the French, Dutch, Portuguese, and Spaniards were also involved in the seizing of lands from the indigenous people and the importation of slaves from West Africa. The implications of this for SVG is that had SVG not be ceded to Great Britain after they defeated the French in the Seven Years’ War (1756-1763) SVG would have remained a French possession, all the lands would have been taken from the indigenous Kalinago and sold to French sugar cane planters, slavery would have exploded, and Chatoyer would have been less of a footnote in history than he is now.

      Indeed, Chatoyer was no national hero since he was financed by the French who wanted to retake SVG after 1763. Again, had this alliance been successful all Black Vincentians would have seen their slave status extended from 1838 to 1848 and we would all be speaking French.

      Again, none of this is an apology for the brutalities of the conquest, the expulsion of the indigenous people (which is “ethnic cleansing,” not “genocide”), and the enslavement of thousands of Africans captured by their own Black brethren and sold to the British, a process so far removed from the real Holocaust which saw the planned extermination of 6 million Jews and millions of other “undesirables” by the Nazis, that it is a libelous insult to their memory.

      This very poor history is a diservice to the Vincentian people.

    2. Linda Paxman on March 24, 2019 6:27 AM

      VERY SAD PAST… SORRY FOR YOUR PAIN…. MAY PEACE COME TO YOU ALL SOON….GOD BLESS US ALL ???

    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Breaking News
    • Local News
    • Regional/International News
    • Sports
    • Opinion
    • Back to School
    Our Socials
    • Facebook
    • Instagram
    ANN

    Asbert News Network is the premier destination for local, regional and international news in St. Vincent and the Grenadines. It’s tomorrow’s news today.

    © 2025 Asbert News Network
    • Home
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms of use
    • Download App

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.