Kingstown, St. Vincent-A proposed constitutional amendment redefining the term “foreign power” has sparked sharp debate, with Opposition Leader Dr. Ralph Gonsalves dismissing Senator Jamalie John’s assurances that the change will not affect election cases.
Senator John has argued that the amendment is a technical clarification, designed to ensure that Commonwealth countries are not considered “foreign powers” under the Constitution. He insisted that the measure would not undermine the Representation of the People’s Act or invalidate ongoing election petitions.
But Dr. Gonsalves forcefully rejected that explanation, warning that the amendment’s wording particularly its reference to “as from the commencement of this constitution” could retroactively impact election challenges.
“I can read the English language, you know, and I know what the constitution says,” Gonsalves said
. “Why you putting that then, as from the commencement of the constitution? If you want to say foreign power in the future shall have that meaning, why do you say in the savings clause that nothing in this section shall be construed as rendering invalid at any time after the commencement of this constitution?”
The Opposition Leader accused the government of attempting to obscure the amendment’s true implications. “John, youthink you’re talking to a fool? Nobody’s going to put any wool over my eye with this,” he said, adding that senior legal counsels across the Caribbean have described the move as “madness.”
Gonsalves stressed that while the amendment’s ability to withstand judicial scrutiny remains uncertain, its intent is “clear, unmistakable.” He warned that the government’s approach could erode constitutional safeguards and electoral integrity.
The amendment is scheduled for debate in Parliament on April 21, 2026. It comes amid ongoing legal proceedings against MPs accused of violating election laws by holding Canadian citizenship. The controversy centers on whether redefining “foreign power” to exclude Commonwealth countries would shield those MPs from disqualification, raising broader questions about constitutional interpretation and the future of election petitions in St. Vincent and the Grenadines.